Check out this correction in the Washington Post:
A Dec. 16 Book World review included an incorrect name for a character in Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice." His name is Fitzwilliam Darcy.
A Dec. 16 Book World review included an incorrect name for a character in Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice." His name is Fitzwilliam Darcy.
(also known as recent comments)
"Provided that nothing like useful knowledge could be gained from them, provided they were all story and no reflection, she had never any objection to books at all."-- Austen on Northanger Abbey's Catherine Morland
hah - the Post has removed the original uncorrected story from its site, so sadly we can't see how they screwed up ol' Fitzy's name in the first place. (yay for transparency!)
ReplyDeleteHOWEVER, they have left up the article's head-smackingly cliche thesis: "Why wouldn't we be wistful for the rules of conduct that shaped Austen and her characters? Our unpredictable, aggressive world makes the drawing rooms of Austen's era a refuge." gag!
methinks the WaPo editors might benefit from reading a more nuanced examination of the subject or two... (cough http://romancingthetome.blogspot.com/2007/10/guest-blogger-fellow-ette-of.html http://sarahmseltzer.com/austen.htm cough)